Choosing judges by public elections is common in the American judicial system; however, many voters wonder how to make an informed choice. Assisting Chicago citizens in this matter is the job of the Judicial Evaluation Committee (JEC), a component of the Chicago Bar Association.
Using a method designed for impartial and confidential assessment of candidates, the JEC reports on incumbent judges and lawyers seeking office. Screeners look at legal knowledge and ability, hard work, integrity, experience, time management, and the presence of a judicial temperament.
The process begins with a lengthy questionnaire. Sitting judges must provide personal and professional references and a list of attorneys who have recently appeared in their courts; those with less than four years on the bench must also list adversaries they have worked with before assuming office. Attorneys seeking judgeships must mention trials they have been involved in, list judges they have faced, and identify lawyers they opposed.
Investigators then interview references and search news reports and court transcripts for incidents of misconduct, along with any disciplinary actions taken.
Randomly chosen bar members then meet to discuss the findings, consider the strengths and weaknesses of candidates, and allow them to make a statement. Candidates are excused, and the members choose from three possibilities: highly qualified, qualified, or not recommended. Eight percent of members must approve a highly qualified designation, with 60 percent required for a qualified designation. Candidates falling below 60 percent receive a not recommended designation.
